Skip to content
Header banner full
Header banner

Taking advantage of the Easter holiday, I travelled to Copenhagen, Denmark. During these few days, I found that the public transportation system is exact developed.

The administrative area of ​​Copenhagen is relatively small, consisting mainly of the old town, the port area and the northern part of Amager Island. How to intensively use land in the case of limited space resources and solve the traffic problem has become the key to the sustainable development of the city.

Copenhagen vigorously advocates the concept of green transportation and strives to achieve maximum traffic efficiency with minimal social cost. It emphasizes that the transportation system must adapt to the environmental and spatial quality of the existing city rather than the city adapting to the development of the transportation system. Therefore, giving priority to the development of public transportation and creating a humanized space has become a significant premise and means of urban renewal.                                                                           Fig 1. Construction of rail transit station drives urban renewal and redevelopment

Finger Planning

Finger Planning in 1947 organically combines rail transit construction with new town planning, making Copenhagen a classic case of successful TOD (Transit-oriented development) mode. In recent years, Copenhagen is firstly committed to building an advanced, efficient and low-pollution subway system that connects the suburb of Amager Island from the city centre, which is the sixth “finger” of the new growth. The entire metro system has two lines, M1 and M2. M1 leads to the planned new area, Restad, guiding the axial development of the new city; M2 extends to the largest airport Copenhagen Kastrup in the Nordic region. People take the subway from the airport to the city centre in just 15 minutes, which greatly enhances the accessibility and mobility of the city.

Positive changes brought by the new subway line

The new subway line focuses on transfers with other modes of transportation. On the one hand, strengthening the connection with the original suburban and regional commuter rail system and the general public transport system, and establishing a developed multi-level public transport system (Figure 2) ensure that any location in the central city can be reached by only one public exchange. These measures facilitate the citizens’ travel when the spatial texture of the old city remains intact. Currently, 46% people in the old city use public transportation, 41% walk or cycle, and only 13% use private cars or taxis.

On the other hand, rapidly develop the urban walking environment and cycling network, and encourage green travel modes by walking and cycling plus rail transit. According to statistics, walking is the most major mode of transportation within 1 km of the station, and cycling dominates the range of 1 to 1.5 km. The urban transportation model has been transformed through a perfect and convenient transportation and transfer system.

The number of people using public transport has increased by 49% compared with that before the opening of the subway, and the number of people driving has dropped by 4%, thereby achieving the goal of the increase in the total number of commuting in the city without increasing or even decreasing the traffic of cars.                                                                                                                     Fig 2. Rail lines in Copenhagen

Conclusion

TOD transportation model has made the environment in Copenhagen more ecological, has improved the mobility and accessibility of the city and realized the efficient operation of the city. Simultaneously, the intensive renewal construction centred on the rail transit station and the pedestrian-centred public living space have promoted the humanization and compact development of the city.


References:

  1. Kbenhavns Kommune, Plan & Arkitectur. Cityscape Atlas Copenhagen 2003[M]. Copenhagen: Planning & Architecture City of Copenhagen, 2003.
  2. The City of Copenhagen Finance Committee Center for Urban Development. The City of Copenhagen Development Plan 2005: City Development Strategy[C]. 51st IFHP World Congress (Futures of Cities), Copenhagen, 2007.
  3. Gehl J, Gemze L, Kirkns S, etal. New City Life[M]. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press, 2006.
  4. Holmfeld D K. Copenhagen Spaces[M]. Copenhagen: The Danish Architectural Press, 1996.

School of Architecture
Planning and Landscape
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear, NE1 7RU

Tel: 0191 208 6509

Email: nicola.rutherford@ncl.ac.uk


Hit Counter provided by recruiting services